Official feedback thread re: the new leveling system

[rudyabel]

Oh nice. Now my status is at risk thanks to one problem 6 months ago. 

[hzsmith]

Same here. Can't wait for the 1970 evaluation 😍

[leonormiserol]

4 minutes ago, hzsmith said:

Same here. Can't wait for the 1970 evaluation 😍

I have an evaluation a year before, I'll let you know how it went in 1969.

[emmaki]

10 minutes ago, uk1000 said:

but they'll have less chance to diversify if they can only add 4 gigs in total due to their level or 10 gigs total/active (for level 2) when previously they could have more.

Exactly - (lower level) sellers will be forced to be more judicious and abandon the old strategy of just throwing up as many gigs as possible for "visibility" that they can't actually do / are just using to highlight (in the case of bad VOAs) "voice type 10". 

In theory, another thing that should pull up the quality of the marketplace, though I think the skip from 10 - 30 (TRS) is very unbalanced, but TRS may not be predisposed to abusing this so much. Fiverr probs has data on it anyway. Besides, with the pressure of SS a lot of sellers who have access to RTO are likely to be more judicious about who they will take on.  

Edited March 14 by emmaki
I have the 1970 bug too

[hzsmith]

This is how the level shows now when you search a gig.

Edited March 14 by hzsmith

[leonormiserol]

I just received an email from fiverr saying that the changes are already being implemented, but strangely I can't upload the image.

[katakatica]

13 minutes ago, vovkaslovesnyy said:

They want me to have a heart attack 😁

@katakatica, I haven't seen your post, sorry 😅

If anything I'm glad I saw yours.

I didn't see the date / etc first because I'm between games at an arcade so I honestly almost had a heartattack. 😅

[visualstudios]

I'm seeing the new level badges, but nothing in the analytics yet!

[paultoole1]

4 minutes ago, katakatica said:

If anything I'm glad I saw yours.

I didn't see the date / etc first because I'm between games at an arcade so I honestly almost had a heartattack. 😅

Yep, nearly had to call 999 when I saw the app version. Talk about rising blood pressure..... Glad I am not the only one.

[frank_d]

Sounds about right 

[emmaki]

I just got an email from Fiverr. It's a bit boring, but the prominent badges sounds interesting. 

[leonormiserol]

This

[maitasun]

22 minutes ago, vovkaslovesnyy said:

They want me to have a heart attack 😁

Same here, but I beat you: Dec 31, 1969. 😂

[emmaki]

ooh, interesting, segmented emails! 

[catwriter]

1 minute ago, emmaki said:

I just got an email from Fiverr.

Got the same email. And, of course, the 1970 bug.

[maitasun]

19 minutes ago, leonormiserol said:

I have an evaluation a year before, I'll let you know how it went in 1969.

Sisters, and from the same country! 😂

[frank_d]

To everyone who get to travel back to 1970 to be evaluated: buy Apple stock!

[emmaki]

My pro profile has the same badge, but this is new: 

(It should be 3.5k I think, can't be bothered to check) 

[emmaki]

Oh, I'm 4.94. That's a bit annoying. Oh well. 

[maitasun]

Just now, frank_d said:

To everyone who get to travel back to 1970 to be evaluated: buy Apple stock!

And for those of us having to travel back to 1969? 

[emmaki]

1 minute ago, frank_d said:

To everyone who get to travel back to 1970 to be evaluated: buy Apple stock!

But then you wouldn't be working on Fiverr and you'd never see this advice...

[vovkaslovesnyy]

5 minutes ago, maitasun said:

Same here, but I beat you: Dec 31, 1969. 😂

Don't forget to eat 12 grapes and wear something yellow!

[frank_d]

1 minute ago, maitasun said:

And for those of us having to travel back to 1969? 

Woodstock!

[hzsmith]

Just now, vovkaslovesnyy said:

Don't forget to eat 12 grapes and wear something yellow!

We do 12 grapes here, but we wear red instead of yellow! 

[uk1000]

7 minutes ago, emmaki said:

(It should be 3.5k I think, can't be bothered to check)

It showed 3.0K yesterday according to Bing cache. It thinks you have 3019 ratings, so rounds to 3.0K.

The 1/1/1970 thing is because of Unix time/epoch so they've not initialised a variable properly but using it anyway probably. And maybe the 31/12/1969 ones are because of a different timezone / that they usually do the evaluation a day earlier I'm guessing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epoch_(computing)

Edited March 14 by uk1000