Jump to content

nicks_voice

Seller Plus Member
  • Posts

    115
  • Joined

  • Last visited

5 Followers

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

nicks_voice's Achievements

Community Regular

Community Regular (8/14)

  • One Year In Rare
  • Very Popular Rare
  • Collaborator Rare
  • One Month Later
  • Week One Done

Recent Badges

663

Reputation

  1. I think the problem is we're given all this new data with no way to take action. One of my gigs has a negative impact for client satisfaction, and I have absolutely no clue why due to the private reviews. This right here is perfect. One time I had a pretty bad experience online shopping, and that is the only time I actually went out of my way to leave a negative review (for context the item I ordered was missing promised parts/misleading from the photos and the buyer said purchase was final and no returns). I never review anything unless I actually had a pretty bad experience so I can warn others. Even so, this new system is showing all these stats we absolutely can't seem to control. Unless we all become "request to buy" sellers with the tedium of having to vet every single buyer (in turn making Fiverr less money due to removing that automation), there's no way around this. Our hands are tied.
  2. And we can go back to having cancelled orders not count for reviews, this can play into this idea here. I still have no idea why 1) a buyer can keep the delivered work, 2) they get a full refund, and 3) they still get to leave feedback if the service was delivered as described. I understand it's to maintain honesty and integrity, but it's still totally unfair, especially for honest sellers. We're not a factory, we spent time doing the work, and now they have it. Do a return on Amazon and they won't give you your money back until you send the item back, plain and simple. Add that on top of the current way Fiverr works, where most if not all buyer mistakes still affect our accounts for absolutely no reason at all. Whether they didn't read our guidelines, or simply wish not to listen to our revision policies, we're always negatively impacted if they decide to direct their anger towards us, with no way to even leave honest reviews for difficult buyers due to private reviews still being a thing, completely eroding transparency for other sellers. It's just a constant loop where every new order is a gamble. I'm hoping some change can be made.
  3. Ive read so many conflicting things about this, I can’t seem to get a straight answer. Is there official documentation of this somewhere?
  4. Sorry, should’ve explained my post better. Will edit, but what I meant was it wouldn’t give buyers a cancellation button, it’d still be the same process as it is currently.
  5. It’s okay to include it as an option, as CS will follow the terms on cancellations anyways as you mentioned. Regardless, buyers can just do this currently anyway.
  6. Enforce a gig's revision limit from a system-level: When a buyer requests a revision when they've either ran out of free revisions, or for gigs that don't offer free revisions, have a text box appear that lets us input the cost of the revision immediately under the request to send to the client. Once the fee is sent and accepted, the order will actually go into revision mode. If it's declined, the order goes back to the "delivered" status. As it stands, if a gig offers no revisions or the buyer has already used all their free revisions, it still lets them request more. This means we have to manually send revision fees via custom offers or the resolution center which takes up a lot of time. It also lets abusive buyers continue to request revisions if they don't accept the extra fees, leaving the order in an "in revision" limbo, leaving us with no option but to contact CS and hopefully get a manual cancellation. Additional QOL: When a client requests a revision, let us manually enter warning text that appears displaying our revision policies. They would have to manually confirm this before continuing. This frees up FAQ/gig description space. For empty revision notes, have a popup which says: "If you've requested a revision without providing notes on what needs to be revised, the seller can deny your request". Allow timestamped revision comments to be viewed on mobile. Currently it's very tedious to hop on a desktop, it should be fluent with the app. Show a counter of remaining free revision requests on the revision button. How these changes help everyone: This solution would free up ours, and also customer support's time, while also making it clear to buyers about how many revisions they're actually granted when purchasing a gig, because as it stands there's way too much leeway and not all buyers read gig FAQ's/descriptions. I'd like to hear everyone else's thoughts on this as it's been a big issue for a long time. Some of the other major freelancing platforms already function this way too, and I think it's time for Fiverr to follow suit.
  7. Does being top rated take into account your average selling price? We all sell different services priced at different price points that are reflective of the market we’re in. Some sellers are doing fantastic volume-wise where those lower starting prices ($5-$10) are made up by having 10-20 orders per day. They still sell like hot cakes. If their buyer satisfaction is high and they do quality work, their average order prices shouldn’t matter at this point. Can we receive a notification when we’ve been reviewed, but denied, and on what basis we can improve before a re-evaluation? The transparency from the new system is great, but it still has the Level 2 purgatory problem as of writing. As soon as the new system went live, I remained at a score of 10 with all metrics maxed out (as they’ve been for almost 3 years now), but am still left with the manual evaluation notification saying I need to wait. Other than that, thanks Yoav! 😃
  8. The level system is here (yes there’s a visual glitch on the app currently, have no fear) Aside from that, Fiverr should be showing total review counts rather than 1k+ beside each gig. Buyers are missing out on a lot of key info here. 20,000 reviews at 4.9 stars speaks volumes compared to 300 at 5 stars.
  9. A big issue Fiverr still has is not displaying our actual total review count on search pages, it caps at 1k+ and won't show anymore. Someone with a long history and over 20,000 reviews gives buyers a lot more insight into their experience, and why their review star average may be lower than the person next to them with only 1001 reviews. I can see how it'd be more fair to keep things this way as everyone would just go with the person who has the higher review count, but these insights would speak volumes to buyers.
  10. This thread deserves a ⭐ 5+ EXCEPTIONAL. This should absolutely be considered by the Fiverr team. The color scale is a brilliant, universal understanding compared to emojis, and the wording is MUCH more clear. Also, now buyer's know how their answers affect the score (finally)!
  11. Our concern was having this question here at all. Rewording it and making it even more detailed is not a good call. "Let's remind the buyer how much money they spent and how long it took after the order is complete" ... why? They've already agreed to purchase our service in the first place. Edit: I'm also hearing it doesn't disclose Fiverr's service fees and instead adds it to the total order cost. A fee that's completely out of our control, affecting our customer's perception of our value. ??
  12. Crazy if that's the route they're taking with this. Going to mention to my SM, as you said I'm sure I shouldn't expect exact answers but if we all bring this up, it could warrant some more clarifications on this.
  13. The new rating requirements for levels seems a bit cut-throat for newer sellers with smaller order averages and high-price, low-quantity sellers where 1 bad review can make an extreme impact VS a seller who does hundreds of orders in the span 60 days. Also, if the whole point is to show that less than 5 stars is still a good review, why are we being majorly penalized for having less than 4.4 on the levels scale? According to the current system, that only leaves wiggle room for 2 stars lost on any of the metrics in total, after that it’s a 4.3 review, which is under the threshold to even get the first level. Would appreciate a reply to these issues. @Kesha
  14. I find it hilarious how they’re showing what looks like a 3 star review showing up as a 5 stars overall, I know it’s just an example but it definitely doesn’t make this whole roll out any less confusing.
  15. I’ve had a buyer keep an order open by constantly extending the review period each time I make a revision. It’s been open for over a month now, and I haven’t been compensated for any work yet. There needs to be a limit to the amount of times they can do this, it’s very frustrating and it’s already being abused.
×
×
  • Create New...