Jump to content

allstral

Member
  • Posts

    37
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by allstral

  1. So, there is "strong" positive/negative and just "positive/negative" impact here I suppose mine is "average" in impact 😂
  2. It's adding up your total performance across all of your gigs, is that correct? thanks for your info, I appreciate it
  3. I'm still using previous dashboard here. For those who have acquired the new one, are the requirements for leveling up still the same as they were in the prior dashboard, or is it now depend on the success score of each gig ? I feel so lightheaded.
  4. Indonesia present here
  5. I may be mistaken, but I'm not sure if the private review has affected your impression in the existing system, right?
  6. I see now, B is quite specific. they are frequently discussed in my community, especially among sellers who receive orders from B 😅
  7. Hello, So after I read it, I thought of a question, correct me if I'm wrong. The conclusion in this sentence is that the option "value for money" already exists in the system that is running now, but the seller cannot see it, because it is separate for customers only (private). Now it is a part of it that the seller can see. based on this statement the reason is in order to get "more insights into customer perceptions and make them more transparent" now the question is: 1. In the current system, "value for money" has no effect on public ratings, am I right? 2. Then in the next system it actually has an effect on the rating. This is a difference that I think is not explained instead of directly offering benefits that I think are fine as long as you don't let that as part of influences the rating as before.
×
×
  • Create New...