youtubefun Posted June 29, 2014 Share Posted June 29, 2014 This way if a buyer that orders wrong or that is just playing games,Or asks you to do something you don’t offerwe the Seller can Hit 'Reject Buyers Order" That way we can avoid all the buyers games Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
consultantindia Posted June 29, 2014 Share Posted June 29, 2014 I second this one. In fact there are many areas where Fiverr needs improvements where both buyers and sellers are protected and the system enjoyable to both.Leaving all those, they worked on ARS?!?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrsspenny Posted June 29, 2014 Share Posted June 29, 2014 I agree Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
misstarah Posted June 30, 2014 Share Posted June 30, 2014 I wholeheartedly agree! There would be so much less harassment and cases of buyers scamming sellers if that was available. Since say we were are of the screen name beforehand through the forum or otherwise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
friendlywebguy Posted July 1, 2014 Share Posted July 1, 2014 I completely agree with this. This can prevent buyers from ruining your hard earned reputation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coolandcute Posted July 1, 2014 Share Posted July 1, 2014 That would be a fantastic feature to have! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uptotop Posted July 3, 2014 Share Posted July 3, 2014 It would harm you as a seller. You will have a hard time filtering out orders before starting work on them.You can always resolve it after he placed an order.More useful tool would be “BAN BUYER” from ordering from you. And you can place them in advanced, before they place an order.Because you can understand/predict him as troubling customer/rival customer from private messaging, or based on his previous orders with you.And save nerves for you and him and feel protected as seller, so not only buyer will advantage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cristinaghy Posted July 3, 2014 Share Posted July 3, 2014 Reply to @uptotop: I agree. I have no idea why the “ignore” feature works only in the chat, but doesn’t stop the person from buying gigs. I mean, if I don’t want a buyer to even message me what on Earth would make Fiverr think I want to accept orders from him/her? An “ignore user” feature should work in regards to the chat AND gigs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
novarabota Posted July 3, 2014 Share Posted July 3, 2014 Great thought! 100% agree with you! I hope Fiverr takes this in consideration! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mm_man56 Posted July 3, 2014 Share Posted July 3, 2014 I agree 🙂 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjakkerman Posted July 3, 2014 Share Posted July 3, 2014 I would be in favour of that, but it would be annoying for buyers if somebody rejects your order after two days or something and you need to order an express gig against a higher price. There should be a time limit for rejecting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freelancemm Posted July 4, 2014 Share Posted July 4, 2014 It’s a good idea but because Fiverr is all about the profit margin, making any order automatically go through they are guaranteed their $1 on all those tiny orders. Then after that it’s just the order gets passed around and around and it doesn’t effect their bottom-line, so I doubt such a feature will ever come into existence. I guess the plus side is now that mutual cancellation doesn’t effect us anymore it’s not as big of a deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rnuyen Posted July 5, 2014 Share Posted July 5, 2014 I completely agree! This would get rid of a lot of issues between buyers and sellers on this site. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
norrsken_marc Posted July 7, 2014 Share Posted July 7, 2014 Agree. There should be a way of flagging those buyers that give most sellers a hard time, and then that “accept or refuse” button as a last resort. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toywebz Posted July 7, 2014 Share Posted July 7, 2014 Its nice…100 LIkes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brooksvideo Posted July 15, 2014 Share Posted July 15, 2014 I wholeheartedly support this, and I would add that we need to see a buyer’s ratings and reviews before we accept a gig. Otherwise the practice of reviewing/rating buyers is useless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rbvover Posted July 16, 2014 Share Posted July 16, 2014 I also agree, a BAN BUYER button would be so helpfull. It makes you feel so low when a buyer is playing you. Have this situation right now. I really would love the buyer to never ever be able to buy from me again. But, “stay polite, just do the job and deliver high quality services off market rates and smile” while being played to avoid any possible negative rating. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
francy986 Posted July 18, 2014 Share Posted July 18, 2014 I support this. =D> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nikihiphop Posted July 18, 2014 Share Posted July 18, 2014 Hahahaha … I really would love it to have such opnion 😃 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.